Revill v casey outcome

Who you choose to defend your case will be key in determining the outcome. Put the right attorney on your side.

In today’s rapidly evolving educational landscape, technology has become an integral part of the learning process. One such innovative tool that is revolutionizing classroom dynami...Attorney for Scott Gilliland and Pamela Casey. /s/ David Gespass David Gespass Gespass & Johnson P.O. Box 550242 Birmingham, AL 35255-0242 205-323-5966. [email protected]. Attorney for Plaintiff Garcia. /s/ Alan Lasseter Alan Lasseter 301 19th Street North, Suite 580 Birmingham, AL 35203-3145 205-458-1212.Tracy Emond. Daniel Bond. Douglas Scofield. Ashley Robertson. Corticia Mitchell-Williams. C hristopher Nola. Emily Small. Contact us at (205) 928-6544 today to inquire about how our Birmingham Lawyers can assist you!Demonstrators gathered in St. Paul, Minn., in 1973, to protest the Supreme Court decision on Roe v. Wade. Associated Press. By a 7 to 2 vote in 1973, the Supreme Court established a constitutional ...IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ROGER W. REVILL, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff Below, Appellee. § § § § No. 619, 1999 § § Court Below: Superior Court § of the State of Delaware in and § for New Castle County § Cr.A. No. IN97-09-1819 § § Submitted: October 17, 2000 Decided: October 20, 2000 Before WALSH, BERGER, and STEELE, Justices.Revill's attorney Clayton R. Tartt says deputies were there under the order of Blount County District Attorney Pamela Casey and says Oneonta Police made the recordings of the encounter.On June 24, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Dobbs v.Jackson Women's Health Organization, 1 overturning Roe v. Wade 2 and Planned Parenthood v. Casey 3 and dismantling 50 years of precedent protecting the constitutional right to abortion in the United States. This article explores the likely impacts of the decision within the United States and elsewhere around the world.

Justia › US Law › Case Law › Georgia Case Law › Supreme Court of Georgia Decisions › 1953 › Revill v. State Revill v. State Annotate this Case. 210 Ga. 139 (1953) 78 S.E.2d 12. REVILL v. THE STATE. 18362. Supreme Court of Georgia. Submitted September 16, 1953. Decided October 14, 1953.More than twenty-one years after Robert Bork's failed Supreme Court nomination and seventeen years after Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, the rhetoric of abortion politics remains unchanged. Pro-choice interests, for example, argue that states are poised to outlaw abortion and that Roe v. Wade is vulnerable to overruling.24 Revill v Newberry [1996] 1 All ER 291, CA. The case arose from an incident in which Ted Newberry, an 82-year-old from Ilkeston, Derbyshire, shot a 12-bore gun at a young intruder, Mark Revill, who was trying to break into Mr Newberry's shed. Mr Newberry was prosecuted on charges of wounding, but was acquitted by a jury.Mr. Revill suffered injuries when he trespassed on Mr. Newbery's land and fell into a trench. Mr. Newbery was keeping valuable items in a shed on the land, which made it an attractive target for burglars. The judge found Mr. Revill to be two thirds to blame for his injuries and rejected the defence of ex turpi causa, accident, and self-defence.Outcome: Wheat v Lacon (1966) Definition of "occupier" More than one party can be considered an occupier if they have control over the premises: Revill v Newbery (1996) Duty of care owed to trespassers: Occupiers are still liable to take reasonable steps to avoid harm even to trespassers:

She was unhappy about the reporting status of that position. She had been reporting directly to Mr. Casey while working on the spin-off, and the assistant controller position reported to the controller, thereby lowering her reporting status. Mr. Casey urged Ms. Cloud to try the position because the company needed her help to complete the spin-off.Motions for reconsideration should not be a "'knee-jerk reaction to an adverse ruling.'". Rueter, 440 F. Supp. 2d at 1267-8) (quoting Summit Medical Center of Alabama, Inc. v. Riley, 284 F. Supp. 2d 1350, 1355 (M. D. Ala. 2003)). A party cannot use a motion for reconsideration "to relitigate old matters, or to raise arguments or present ...In Roe v.Wade, the Supreme Court held that, under the right to privacy inherent in the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, a woman has the fundamental right to terminate her pregnancy. 410 U.S. 113, 147 (1973).Although the government has a compelling state interest in protecting potential life, the Court determined that this governmental interest only permits the government to ...Global Freedom of Expression. Columbia University 91 Claremont Ave, Suite 523 New York, NY 10027. 1-212-854-6785Filing 4 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to JOEL BENJAMIN REVILL (rlw) August 6, 2019 Filing 3 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court.Case Information Case Title. Megan Garcia, et al v. Pamela Casey, et al. Case Number. 21-13632. Court. Appellate - 11th Circuit. Nature of Suit. 3440 Other Civil Rights

Taino warrior tattoos.

Winner v. Revill. April 13, 2006 Appeal from 382 N.J.Super. 399, 889 A.2d 477. Petition for certification… Rosado v. Marshall. That is a probable result here. Arbitration will not likely result in a more efficient and expeditious…Jan 18, 2019 · Filing 26 CONSOLIDATION ORDER; The Court CONSOLIDATE Garcia v. Casey, 2:18-cv-02079-KOB and Revill v. Casey, 2:19-cv-00114-RDP pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42. Signed by Chief Judge Karon O Bowdre on 7/1/2019. (JLC) July 1, 2019: Cases associated.Feb 12, 2020 · THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO BOTH CASES MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. KARON OWEN BOWDRE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.. This matter comes before the court on three motions for reconsideration (Garcia Docs. 49 and 55, and Revill Doc. 36), pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e), regarding this court's memorandum opinion and accompanying order of August 1, 2019 (Garcia Docs. 46, 47). 1 ...After Roe v. Wade, the polarization of supporters and detractors of the right to abortion resulted in both legislative restrictions on abortion and legal battles to protect Roe.The U.S. Supreme Court had several opportunities to revisit Roe, and each time the Court upheld it, albeit weakening its foundations.Between 1988 and 1989 Pennsylvania's legislature passed five amendments to the ...

This lawyer gets arrested, charged, and has a complaint filed against him to the bar association in Alabama. All for doing what lawyers do, just defending his client. He is so lucky there was video of the incident! Here is the best story I have found. The Officers name is Sue Ashworth and the prosecutor is Pam Casey, although she handed the ...Friday, January 18, 2019. 38 pgs COMPLAINT against Sue Ashworth, Pamela Casey, Scott Gilliland, Bryan K Ratliff, filed by Victor Revill. (KEK) Revill v. Casey et al (2:19-cv-00114), Alabama Northern District Court, Filed: 01/18/2019 - PacerMonitor Mobile Federal and Bankruptcy Court PACER Dockets.Petitioner West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. (WVUH), operates a hospital in Morgantown, W. Va., near the Pennsylvania border. The hospital is often used by medicaid recipients living in southwestern Pennsylvania. In January 1986, Pennsylvania's Department of Public Welfare notified WVUH of new medicaid reimbursement schedules for ...'A core outcome set for studies evaluating the effectiveness of prepregnancy care for women with pregestational diabetes' Egan, A.M. and Galjaard, S. and Maresh, M.J.A. and Loeken, M.R. and Napoli, A. and Anastasiou, E. and Noctor, E. and de Valk, H.W. and van Poppel, M. and Todd, M. and Smith, V. and Devane, D. and Dunne, F.P. (2017) 'A core …Revill's attorney Clayton R. Tartt says deputies were there under the order of Blount County District Attorney Pamela Casey and says Oneonta Police made the recordings of the encounter.Id. at 557-58 (citing Schmank v. Sonic Auto., Inc., No. E2007-01857-COA-R3-CV, 2008 WL 2078076 at *3 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008) (emphasis added)). "State law strongly favors the resolution of all disputes on their merits, and the savings statute is to be given a broad and liberal construction in order to achieve this goal." Freeman v. Marco Transp.Garcia v. Casey et al (2:18-cv-02079), Alabama Northern District Court, Filed: 12/18/2018 ... Opinion and Order DENYING Defendants' Motion to Dismiss as to Ms. Garcia's Counts Two and Three and as to Mr. Revill's Counts Nine, Ten, Eleven, Twelve, and Thirteen. Signed by Judge Karon O Bowdre on 2/12/2020. Associated Cases: ...Medicine Matters Sharing successes, challenges and daily happenings in the Department of Medicine ARTICLE: Go Red for Women Strategically Focused Research Network: Summary of Findi...

Harvey v Facey Privy Council (Jamaica) Citations: [1893] AC 552. Facts The claimants sent a telegraph asking if the defendant was willing to sell them a piece of property (BHP). They asked what price the defendant would sell it for. The defendant responded by telegraph: 'Lowest price for B. H. P. £900'.

On July 1, 2019, this court consolidated the two cases because of the multiple common issues of law and fact. (Revill Doc. 26). So, the court will now consider both motions together because they both raise the same issues of immunity, with the exception of judicial or quasi-judicial immunity and sovereign immunity, which are only raised in Ms. Garcia's case.The petition of defendants and appellants for review by the Supreme Court was denied February 23, 2000. Chin, J., and Brown, J., were of the opinion that the petition should be granted. Read Cloud v. Casey, 76 Cal.App.4th 895, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext's comprehensive legal database.CONCLUSION. In light of the foregoing, the Defendants, Blount County District Attorney. Pamela Casey and Blount County Assistant District Attorney Scott Gilliland, request that this Court deny Plaintiff Revill’s Motion for Reconsideration and. thereby deny his request to reinstate his alleged defamation, false light, and.CASEY v. CASEY 2005 OK 13 109 P.3d 345 Case Number: 99217 Decided: 03/08/2005 THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA. MAX CASEY, PATRICIA NICHOLS and CAROLYN O'NEAL Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. MARGIE CASEY, Defendant/Appellant, CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS, DIVISION IV. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DELAWARE COUNTYOfficial Publications from the U.S. Government Publishing Office.Facts of Revill v Newbery. Newbery, a 76-year-old pensioner, was the owner of an allotment shed. There were previous break-ins in his shed so he decided to sleep in it to protect from intruders. One night, a man named Revill accompanied by Grainger, attempted to break into the shed. With a view to frighten them away, Newbery used his 12-bore ...Today, justice was finally served for attorneys Victor Revill and Megan Garcia. It has been over a year waiting for this day in court, and today they were acquitted of all charges in Blount County....ContentsGrutter v. Bollinger Case Brief Following is the case brief for Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003). Case Summary of Grutter v. Bollinger: The University of Michigan Law School denied Barbara Grutter's application to the School. Grutter, a white Michigan resident, then sued the Law School. Grutter claimed that the Law School's use of affirmative action in its admissions ...MEMORANDUM OPINION. KARON OWEN BOWDRE, District Judge. These consolidated § 1983 civil rights and defamation cases come before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiffs Megan Garcia and Victor Revill claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 that Deputies Sue Ashworth and Brian Ratliff, as Deputies...

Spalding inmate search.

Boss rt3 wiring diagram.

Want to ensure you get First Class or at least 2.1 honours in. We've created a FREE checklist for you to maximise your chances of getting high grades! Download The Checklist Now.These consolidated § 1983 civil rights and defamation cases come before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiffs Megan Garcia and Victor Revill claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 that Deputies Sue Ashworth and Brian Ratliff, as Deputies in the Blount County Sheriff's Department, unlawfully arrested them in violation of their ...Plaintiffs believe that Ms. Casey instructed Deputy Ashworth to arrest Ms. Garcia and Mr. Revill because immediately following the call, Deputy Ashworth and Deputy Ratliff arrested Plaintiffs for obstructing government operations. Mr. Revill did not consent to a search or seizure not authorized by a warrant.Nearly 50 years ago, the Supreme Court legalized abortion in the United States with its decision in Roe v. Wade, reshaping the nation’s social and political landscape. On Monday night, Politico ...GARCIA v. CASEY No. 21-13632. View Case; 75 F.4th 1176 (2023) ... is whether government officers are entitled to qualified immunity for arresting attorneys Megan Garcia and Victor Revill for stashing their client's cellphone in a bag only minutes before the police executed a search warrant for child pornography on that phone.People v Casey: 2021 NY Slip Op 02471 [193 AD3d 600] April 22, 2021: ... and pursuant to our own interest of justice powers, we waive the surcharge and fees (see People v Chirinos, 190 AD3d 434 [1st Dept 2021]). We find it unnecessary to reach any other issues. Concur—Acosta, P.J., Renwick, Singh, Moulton, JJ. ...Scott Gilliland ordered the arrest. Following the arrest, DA Casey, in a statement to the press, and ADA Gilliland, on the courthouse steps, publicly accused Garcia and Revill of concealing evidence of a crime and knowingly possessing child pornography. After Garcia and Revill were tried and acquitted for the state -01/18/2019. Case Status: Pending - Other Pending. Case Type: Civil Right - Other Civil Right. Court: U.S. District Courts. Courthouse: Alabama Northern District Court. Judge Details. Presiding Judge. Karon O Bowdre. Party Details. Plaintiff. Victor Revill. Defendants. Bryan K Ratliff. Sue Ashworth. Pamela Casey. Scott Gilliland. ….

Case Information Case Title. Megan Garcia, et al v. Pamela Casey, et al. Case Number. 21-13632. Court. Appellate - 11th Circuit. Nature of Suit. 3440 Other Civil RightsRevill v Newbery [1996] 2 WLR 239 Court of Appeal. Mr Newbery was a 76 year old man. He owned an allotment which had a shed in which he kept various valuable items. The shed was subject to frequent break ins and vandalism. Mr Newbery had taken to sleeping in his shed armed with a 12 bore shot gun.DA has to know that there was no valid grounds for arrest. Yet she still prosecuted the case to a trial, that the judge had to dismiss. Just one more example that there are not sufficient incentives for DAs and police to follow the law.v. ) ) PAMELA CASEY, SCOTT GILLILAND, ) SUE ASHWORTH, and BRIAN K. ) RATLIFF, ) ) THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO BOTH CASES . Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER . This matter comes before the court on three motions for reconsideration (Garcia Docs. 49 and 55, and Revill Doc. 36), pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e), regarding thisFollowing is the case brief for Griswold v. Connecticut, Supreme Court of the United States, (1965) Case Summary of Griswold v. Connecticut: Buxton and Griswold were the Director and Executive Director for Connecticut’s Planned Parenthood league. Both were arrested and convicted as “accessories” for providing information, advice and ...See V.R.Cr.P. 14(b)(2)(D)-(E). Specifically addressing severance with respect to defendant, the court stated: The State has given notice of its intent to introduce other uncharged acts under V.R.E. 404(b) against each defendant. Defendant-Casey argues that the jury will be required to distinguish between acts involving other men and Defendant-3Transcript of Trial (“Transcript”) held on March 29, 2018 in the case of State of Alabama v. Megan Nicole Garcia (DC 17-226 and 227) and Victor Martell Revill (DC 17-228 and 229), Circuit Court of Blount County, Alabama. Objections and rulings on them have been omitted from these excerpts but the Transcript is attached hereto as Exhibit A).Science News highlights from the American Heart Association's Stroke journal article, "Telemedicine Quality and Outcomes in Stroke National Center 7272 Greenville Ave. Dallas, TX 7... Revill v casey outcome, A woman was awarded $3 million after suing a former Bibb County deputy who was convicted for sexually assaulting her in his office at the sheriff's department in 2013. The case has garnered local ..., Plaintiff Pamela Casey filed a petition for divorce in 2003. The district court entered a decree of dissolution and divided the marital property. Defendant William Casey appealed, and the appellate court remanded the case and ordered the lower court to adjust the division of the marital property. The trial judge remembered hearing an earlier case involving Plaintiff when he worked at the ..., Plaintiff VICTOR REVILL is an individual over the age of nineteen (19) years and a resident of the United States currently residing in Alabama. 5. Defendant PAMELA CASEY is an individual over the age of nineteen (19) years and a resident of the United States. At all times relevant to this Complaint, Defendant Casey was the Blount County ..., Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey is the Supreme Court case that had reaffirmed the decision of Roe v. Wade (1973) prohibiting states from disallowing abortion prior to viability. However, at the time, the Court overruled two aspects of the Roe decision: (1) the trimester distinction and (2) the use of strict scrutiny for judicial review of government regulation of ..., Her daughter, Casey, "tricked me into signing papers" so she "would not get higher taxes" under Proposition 19. When Casey presented the documents to Bovis to sign, she did not tell her the home would no longer be in her name. Bovis admittedly did not read the documents. She later discovered the documents transferred title to Casey., Mr. Revill suffered injuries when he trespassed on Mr. Newbery's land and fell into a trench. Mr. Newbery was keeping valuable items in a shed on the land, which made it an attractive target for burglars. The judge found Mr. Revill to be two thirds to blame for his injuries and rejected the defence of ex turpi causa, accident, and self-defence., For example Revill v Newbery [1996] 2 WLR 239 Case summary, Nettleship v Weston [1971] 3 WLR 370 Case summary. S.1(1) Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945 provides that where a person suffers damage as a result partly of his own fault and partly the fault of another(s), a claim shall not be defeated by reason of the fault of the person …, Ms. Garcia and Mr. Revill each filed separate cases against Ms. Casey, Mr. Gilliland, Deputy Ashworth, and Deputy Ratliff; the complaints alleged multiple counts, including malicious prosecution, unlawful detention, and defamation as well as violations of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. Ms. Casey and Mr. Gilliland jointly filed motions to ..., Education plays a pivotal role in shaping the future of any nation. To ensure that educational institutions are functioning effectively and providing quality education, it is essen..., M CASEY RODGERS: Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability: Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability: Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff: RSS Track this Docket ... Eastern District Virginia by DAVID REVILL (BUSTAMANTE, BRETT) November 13, 2022: Filing 1 ..., Looking Back on Casey its last major abortion case, Planned Parenthood v. Casey.7 Part II ar-gues that the undue burden test adopted in Casey protects women only against total prohibitions on their right to choose to have a safe abortion. Like traditional rules regarding rape, it requires women to resist to the utmost in order to preserve their ..., The issue is summed up in paras 5 to 6 of the judgment: The first issue on Pel-Air's appeal is whether the primary judge erred in concluding that Ms Casey's PTSD constituted a "bodily injury". Ms Casey may only recover damages for that type of injury by reason of the 1999 Montreal Convention relating to International Carriage by Air ..., Garcia v. Casey et al, No. 2:2018cv02079 - Document 65 (N.D. Ala. 2020) case opinion from the Northern District of Alabama US Federal District Court ... (Garcia Doc. 49 and Revill Doc. 36.) 2 Defendants Pamela Casey and Scott Gilliland filed a joint motion asking the court to reconsider whether Defendants sufficiently raised the argument that ..., Facts of Revill v Newbery. Newbery, a 76-year-old pensioner, was the owner of an allotment shed. There were previous break-ins in his shed so he decided to sleep in it to protect from intruders. One night, a man named Revill accompanied by Grainger, attempted to break into the shed. With a view to frighten them away, Newbery used his 12-bore ..., No. 04—1144. Argued November 30, 2005-Decided January 18, 2006. New Hampshire's Parental Notification Prior to Abortion Act, in relevant part, prohibits physicians from performing an abortion on a pregnant minor until 48 hours after written notice of such abortion is delivered to her parent or guardian., She was unhappy about the reporting status of that position. She had been reporting directly to Mr. Casey while working on the spin-off, and the assistant controller position reported to the controller, thereby lowering her reporting status. Mr. Casey urged Ms. Cloud to try the position because the company needed her help to complete the spin-off., Nearly 50 years ago, the Supreme Court legalized abortion in the United States with its decision in Roe v. Wade, reshaping the nation’s social and political landscape. On Monday night, Politico ..., 19-114 - Revill v. Casey et al - Content Details - - GovInfo. www.govinfo.gov › app › details › USCOURTS-alnd-2_19-cv-00114. Sue Ashworth, Defendant Pamela Casey, Defendant Scott Gilliland, Defendant Bryan K Ratliff, Defendant Alabama State Bar, Miscellaneous. Images. View all < >, 5–4 decision for Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania. In a bitter 5-to-4 decision, the Court again reaffirmed Roe, but it upheld most of the Pennsylvania provisions. For the first time, the justices imposed a new standard to determine the validity of laws restricting abortions. The new standard asks whether a state abortion ..., In 1992, the Supreme Court addressed the question of whether Roe v.Wade, the landmark 1973 decision which established constitutional protection for a woman's right to access abortion, should be overturned.Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, involved abortion restrictions that the Supreme Court had found unconstitutional under the strict scrutiny standard adopted in Roe ..., Jan 18, 2019 · FJC IDB Information for Revill v. Casey, 2:19-cv-00114 — Brought to you by the RECAP Initiative and Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information., If 1973's Roe has the name recognition, 1992's Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey sets the "undue burden" standard by which restrictive abortion laws sprouting around ..., Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78 (1987), was a U.S. Supreme Court decision involving the constitutionality of two Missouri prison regulations. One of the prisoners' claims related to the fundamental right to marry, and the other related to freedom of speech (in sending/receiving letters). The court held that a regulation preventing inmates from marrying without permission violated their ..., Occupiers Liability Act 1984: The case of Revill v Newbery (1996) challenged the prevailing legal provisions regarding the duty of care owed to trespassers, embodied in the Occupiers Liability Act 1984. The Court ruled in favor of the injured trespasser, holding that occupiers remain liable to take reasonable steps to prevent foreseeable harm ..., The Court of Appeal in Revill v Newbery [1996] QB 567 held that the 1984 Act only governs the duty of an occupier as an occupier, and so does not govern his activities on the land. Lords Hoffman and Hobhouse in Tomlinson v Congleton BC [2004] 1 AC 46 stated ( obiter ) that the Act also extends to dangerous activities the occupier permitted., Citation518 U.S. 343, 116 S. Ct. 2174, 135 L. Ed. 2d 606, 1996 U.S. Brief Fact Summary. Prisoners sued the State of Arizona, alleging they were deprived of rights of access to courts and counsel. Synopsis of Rule of Law. Access to the courts by prisoners requires that prisoners be able to address their own., Sue Ashworth, Defendant Pamela Casey, Defendant Scott Gilliland, Defendant Bryan K Ratliff, Defendant Alabama State Bar, Miscellaneous Blount County Department of Human Resources, Miscellaneous, Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey is the Supreme Court case that had reaffirmed the decision of Roe v. Wade (1973) prohibiting states from disallowing abortion prior to viability. However, at the time, the Court overruled two aspects of the Roe decision: (1) the trimester distinction and (2) the use of strict scrutiny for judicial review of government regulation of ..., Docket activity of federal case Revill v. Casey et al, case number 2:19-cv-00114, from Alabama Northern Court., Study with Quizlet and memorize flashcards containing terms like Planned Parenthood v. Casey (question), Planned Parenthood v. Casey (outcome), U.S. v. Lopez (question) and more., Education plays a pivotal role in shaping the future of any nation. To ensure that educational institutions are functioning effectively and providing quality education, it is essen..., VICTOR REVILL, ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CASE NO.: 2:19-cv-00114-KOB ) PAMELA CASEY, ET AL. ) Defendants. ) PLAINTIFF REVILL'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES . Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26, 33 and 34, Plaintiff ... (Defendants Casey and Gilliland only). INTERROGATORY NO. 1 8: Please list and describe in detail any offers (including, WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Friday overturned Roe v. Wade, eliminating the constitutional right to abortion after almost 50 years in a decision that will transform American life, reshape ...